Child Tracking Device Feature – Battery

Battery Life

You may think it strange that I have included Battery Life as a separate feature of child tracking locator devices, but it is actually one of the most important to consider when buying a personal tracker. Whereas a vehicle tracker can be connected up to the battery or a cigar lighter socket, there is obviously nowhere that can you plug it in on your child!  Recharging on-the-fly is not possible at present.

Having a tracker that has good overall features is all well and good, but if the battery dies then it is simply an expensive plastic ornament. Moreover, if this event is too frequent then it will soon become expected to happen and the parent will not monitor with the same enthusiasm. One day the tracker may go out of service due to a real situation, such as an abduction attempt, and nobody would be any wiser!

I’ve seen battery life on some models as low as 24 hours, which effectively means having to charge it up every day from the day of purchase. It’s also worth bearing in mind the memory effect of batteries that are repeatedly charged, whereby the usable time of a battery reduces over time between charges. It is anybody’s guess how long it will take for the unit to require charging too often to be practical in daily use. I’ve had a mobile phone (an early smart phone) which needed daily charging and it very soon effectively became a static desk phone because it always needed to be near a electrical outlet socket. In that case, you could say that at least the phone was still usable, but the same would not be true for a static tracking device.

For a device to be worthwhile it is simply a case of the longer the battery life, the better. Watch out for manufacturers quoting the “sleep” time, or “standby” time for batteries. This measurement may help for comparison of different models, but you are going to want the device to be actively monitoring the child on a regular basis which will drain the power faster than the quoted rate. Once again, if experiences with the mobile phone industry are anything to go by, it is unlikely that such quoted battery life figures will be directly comparable between different manufacturers. This is because they will have different methods of testing the devices. They have tended to use pretty unrealistic testing scenarios, such as having the device always in an area with solid signal reception, having no calls made or received, and so on.

So how can we realistically make comparisons between products? In a nutshell, try to find independent product reviews. A good review should include tests of battery life under a variety of practical uses. If the tests show a wide divergence from the manufacturers quoted life, then other claims about the device could be suspect.

In the meantime, look out for devices that have good quality batteries with long usable charge time. Also, check whether the battery can be charged outside of the tracking unit itself (i.e. in a separate charging unit). Then by having two batteries, you could charge the spare while the tracker is in use and swap them over when required.

Here at childtracking.org we will be conducting our own tests and sourcing independent reviews of child tracking devices and services. We welcome any input that you may have and will bear this in mind during our own research. You can contact us with your views.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Posted in Child Tracking Devices | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Child Tracking Devices Feature – Voice Surveillance

Mother listening to her child via her computer

Voice Surveillance is a feature of some child tracking devices

Voice Surveillance, or Audio Surveillance is a feature that is sometimes found on personal tracking locator devices. These are the small devices that are designed to be carried in person, rather than attached permanently to vehicles.

What does this feature do?

Well, the best way to think of it is a one-way mobile phone conversation (a bit like the ones I tend to have with my mother), or as eavesdropping in on the conversation that is going on around the device.

Why might you want this feature?

It can sometimes be useful to listen in on what is going on around your child, without alerting anyone that monitoring is taking place. For instance, perhaps the child has pressed the panic alarm and you would like to hear what is happening as well as to be able to track his location on a map. If you were to make a standard mobile phone call to the child (if they are old enough to carry a mobile phone), then this may immediately alert someone that tracking was taking place. In the event of an abduction attempt, the abductor would instantly know that there is a child tracking device and would doubtless dispose of it there and then.

Audio surveillance could also come in handy if you suspect that your child is being bullied at school and perhaps has not informed you out of fear of reprisals. The child himself would not be aware that you were listening in on the conversation and would therefore act no differently to normal, again this would not alert anybody that monitoring is taking place.

How does it work?

The initiation of the eavesdropping is carried out by the monitoring parent/guardian by sending a code and password to the device. A response is received from the device to say that the monitoring mode has been enabled and the parent can dial-up the unit to hear what is happening around the tracker. Once the feature is enabled, the device can also be switched from monitoring mode to tracking mode and back again whenever required.

This feature is normally absent from car trackers, since it would not be too interesting to listen in on the engine noise.

It is a feature of child tracking devices that we will be testing here at childtracking.org as we want to know how well it picks out voices from the general background noise. We are interested in the clarity of the audio.

If anybody has any experience of using the feature, we welcome any comments and will take them on board when we do our own testing.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Posted in Child Tracking Devices | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Child Tracking Device Feature – GeoFencing

Child Tracking Device Feature - GeoFence

Geofence district displayed on a map

Many good child tracking devices include a feature called Geo-Fencing.  This is the ability to define a set area, or a number of set areas that constitute a district to be monitored.  Limitations of the systems currently mean that this district will be rectangular, but the area can be as large or as small as you like.

To set-up a geo-fence area you typically need to provide the tracking locator device with two sets of coordinates, one for the top-left corner and another for the bottom right.  The coordinates are given as the latitude and longitude for each of the two points.  Although this may sound complicated, often there is software which allows you to define the two points simply by clicking on a map.  The coordinates are then transmitted to the device itself to monitor entry to and exit from the defined area.

When the device moves out of the geofence district it will send a message to the authorized mobile cell phone numbers, an email account, or to a centralized monitoring system.  In some cases, the monitoring function will become invalid once the unit moves outside the district. In other words, the device only alarms once for each geo-fence setting.  In this case you would need to reset it for repeat use.  A decent monitoring software system should allow you to specify that you want the area to be reset automatically if breached.

You could, for example, create a geofence virtual perimeter around your child’s school to alert you whenever he leaves.  In the case of unexpected movement, you could then instigate another feature of child tracking devices that I will describe in my next feature article – Voice Surveillance.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Posted in Child Tracking Devices | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Was recent GPS Surveillance of student by the FBI justifiable?

Student reveals the Tracking Locator Device

The Tracking Locator device that was discovered by the student

A news report on Wired has described a recent discovery of a tracking device on the car of a student.  It transpired that it had been placed there by the FBI when they subsequently demanded that the device be handed back.  From comments made by the agents, the GPS surveillance device was probably attached to the students car for three to six months.

The student in question was the son of an Islamic-American community chief who died last year in Egypt.  Due to a ruling by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, it is legal for law enforcement to secretly place a tracking device on a suspect’s car without requiring a warrant.  The ruling may well be challenged as more cases such as this one come to light.

“It seems very frightening that the FBI have placed a surveillance-tracking device on the car of a 20-year-old American citizen who has done nothing more than being half-Egyptian”

A former FBI agent has said that he was surprised the device was so easily found.

After learning about her client’s experience, the student’s attorney said that colleagues have told her that they already know of two other people in Ohio who recently discovered tracking locator devices on their vehicles.

As it stands, this incident should be enough to raise a few eyebrows, but what I find even more revealing is the attitude of some commentators about the incident.  Here is a selection of comments made by people who see nothing wrong with this kind of activity.

“How many 20 year olds do you know who have extensive ties to the Middle East and have the time and means to make frequent overseas trips to the Middle East while a full time student and employed?  Sound pretty suspicious, doesn’t it?”

“I don’t think the FBI’s extra attention was unwarranted…You have an Arab-American citizen, who moved to Egypt (an area of the world known for radicalizing people), who then moved back to the U.S., who lives with another Arab-American who made (even in jest) questionable internet posts, who works for a company requiring him to travel frequently to the Middle East, and who agrees to answer questions only with a lawyer present…..”

“This is only crazy if the student is totally innocent. We have no idea. Just from the face of it he hits a lot of markers that the FBI would be looking for. I’m glad the FBI is surveilling possible suspects.”

You might think that these views are in a minority, but it is just as likely that you agree with them.  After all, the legislators proposed and passed the aforementioned ruling which backed this unrestrained activity by Law Enforcement.  Maybe it’s easy to be in favour of this kind of covert surveillance when you don’t believe that you will be affected by it, but do any of us really understand what profiling methods are used to mark out suspects for tracking?

If being of foreign extraction and taking frequent trips abroad are considered justification, then the manufacturers of GPS devices used by the FBI are in for a bumper sales period!

So what do you think?  Does this have shades of George Orwell’s 1984, or should we be embracing this usage of GPS surveillance to keep us safe from those suspected of terrorism?

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Posted in GPS Surveillance | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Child Tracking raises new moral and legal issues

The controversy over the use of Child Tracking technology rages on. Without any doubt, the rapid uptake and rise in affordable availability of Child GPS tracking technology is raising new moral and legal issues. A recent Fox News broadcast highlighted the same concerns about GPS Surveillance that we have been discussing here at childtracking.org.

As a parent myself, I have a peculiar feeling of dichotomy regarding the subject. On the one hand, I want to do all I can to keep my children safe and to know exactly where they are and what they are up to. Yet the last thing I want is for other people to have the same access – even those who are charged with looking after them! I suppose it’s the normal feeling that nobody would look after my children with the same diligence that I would. It’s overprotective, I’m sure, but I can’t help myself.

The Fox report does reiterate the need for us to be vigilant as a society when it comes to implementing this technology. Among the useful tips in the report to be considered before signing up to any tracking service:

  • what kind of information is being gathered?
  • who has access to the information?
  • how long is it kept, and when is it going to be deleted?

Of course, it’s not so easy to know how accurate the answers are that we may get in reply.  I don’t suppose any provider of the services is likely to say “Actually, we don’t really have the best security in place for our computer systems, who knows when we may get hacked, assuming it hasn’t happened already?”.

I would feel happier if the tracking system did not hold personal information to identify what or who is being tracked.  So ID 947563 could be a taxi, or a parcel, or a dog, just as easily as it could be a child.  Though having said that, it wouldn’t take a rocket scientist to know that it’s not likely to be a dog inside the local elementary school.

It’s all food for thought.  I’m now thinking that it would be better to get a unit that simply transmits the location of the tracker to my mobile phone, rather than to a dedicated tracking service.  There are pro’s and con’s to this, some of which I’ve already discussed in my earlier articles.  I keep changing my mind as to what is the best way to approach this.

I guess I’m probably not alone, but I’m determined to work my way through the maze.  You’ll be the first to see the results of my research here at childtracking.org

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Posted in Child Tracking | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

How to spy on your teenage child without them knowing

Do you know what your teenager is getting up to when away from home?   Do you know where they go, what they are doing, who they are associating with?  Does it worry you?  Although we at childtracking.org primarily concentrate on child tracking for younger children, many parents may be concerened about their older teenage children.  Using a dedicated tracking locator device in these circumstances may not be enough, and older children may refuse to carry such devices – particularly if they have something to hide!

Well, now there is a new product that you can use to help you find the answers to these questions and more.  It’s called Mobile Spy and is an unobtrusive piece of software that can be simply installed onto your older child’s mobile phone without them even knowing that it is running! Only you will be aware of this and it will provide you with valuable information about what your teenager is doing.

Mobile Spy GPS SoftwareThese days it seems increasingly easy for children to associate with a bad crowd, so as parents it makes sense to take a pro-active approach to checking where they hang-out and with whom.  Or maybe you’re concerned that your child is the target of abuse via the mobile cell phone, but they may be too afraid to tell you directly.  Perhaps they are receiving inappropriate texts or images, or unwanted attention.  Now you can take action.

The Mobile Spy is a completely new generation of software that runs independently in stealth-mode on the cell phone.  Once installed on the phone, you simply begin recording to monitor activities and transmit the results to your account.  The results can then be viewed remotely by simply logging in to your own secure account on the Mobile Spy web site.  Results can be viewed by category and sorted however you wish for easy browsing.  The software does not rely on the phone’s call and message logs to record activities. So even if the user tries to delete their tracks, the data will still be retained and uploaded.

It is compatible with most models of iPhone, BlackBerry or Android phones, plus Windows Mobile, Symbian OS and iPad.

You can finally learn the truth about your teenager’s call, mobile web, text message activities, and GPS locations by logging into your Mobile Spy account from any computer. Now you can view all photos and videos taken by the phone too!

blue findoutmore1 How to spy on your teenage child without them knowing

Here is a list of activities that can be monitored once the software is installed on a compatible mobile cell phone:

  • Call Logging - each incoming and outgoing number is logged along with duration and time stamp.
  • SMS (Text Messages) Log – every text message is logged even if the phone’s logs are deleted. Includes full text.
  • GPS Locations Log – GPS postions are uploaded every thirty minutes with a link to a map.
  • Contacts - Every contact on the phone is logged. New contacts added are also recorded.
  • Tasks – All personal tasks that are created are logged and viewable.
  • Memos – Every memo input into the phone is logged and viewable.
  • Cell ID Locations - ID information on all cell towers that the device enters into range of is recorded.
  • Email Log -All inbound & outbound email activity is logged. Emails are viewable in their entirety.
  • Calendar Events – Every calendar event is logged. Date, time, and locations are recorded.
  • URL (website visits) Log – All URL website addresses visited using the phone’s browser are logged.
  • Photo and Video Log – All photos & videos taken by the phone are recorded & are viewable.

blue findoutmore1 How to spy on your teenage child without them knowing

Child Tracking - Mobile Spy GPS

Child Tracking - Mobile Spy GPS

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Posted in Spy GPS | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

GPS Surveillance – Child Tracking by Schools

I’m in favour of tracking of my own children using the technological solutions that are becoming more widely available, as they can give me the peace of mind that I know my child is where he is supposed to be.  However, I’m not quite so keen when it comes to allowing other people or organizations from utilizing the same GPS Surveillance techniques to keep tabs on my offspring.  It smacks of being a bit too Orwellian for my liking, and I still question whether such powers would be abused.  Nonetheless, I can see a use for schools to use the technology to be able to check the whereabouts of a child in case of problems during field trips for example.  This would be useful, as long as the technology is not simply used by teachers as an excuse to abdicate their own responsibility when it comes to looking after the children in their care. There may be a danger of carers becoming complacent that they no longer need to remain vigilant at all times.

It has been in the news recently about a Child Location Observation and Utilization Data System (CLOUDS) initiative in an school in the USA.  This system requires that the kids
wear school jersey’s that are embedded with GPS surveillance tracking chips, so that the administrators can check that the children are where they are expected be at any time
during the day.  The driver for implementing this very costly system was an administrative burden of having to register all of the children in the school on an hourly basis.  This all seems like overkill to me, since basically the system was installed just so that teachers no longer had to take registers!  Surely the burden of having to register the
children on a hourly basis itself was a bit of overkill in the first place?  In my opinion, the use of child GPS tracking is not really the solution to this relatively simple problem.  It is
an administrative burden that could be addressed by other means, or by removing as a burden, rather than using technology to try to enforce the unenforceable.  I think the school has been a bit quick to jump on the technological bandwagon, seizing an opportunity of funding for a project that wasn’t really necessary for the stated reasons.

There are security concerns surrounding the use of centralised tracking of children:

  • who has access to the data?
  • are the administrators screened, or vetted by Police before being given responsibility for the data?
  • is the data secure from other prying eyes?
  • could it fall into the wrong hands?
  • what methods are in place to ensure that only the authorised administrators are able to access the data?

In addition, the system is all well and good as long as firm procedures are put in place in the event that there is a wandering child that has gone missing.  At what point would
the Police be called, for example, if a child is found to be away from the school premises?  If the tracking locator units themselves are found to be unreliable, say by regularly losing a GPS signal, or running out of battery power, then there would be a danger that a genuine missing child could be assumed to be on the premises.  I don’t know the details, but can only hope that these and a multitude of issues have been discussed and formulated into strong procedures.

For my part, I personally want to have more say in how this technology is used when it comes to tracking my own children.  I’m concerned that this simple wish will be overruled in the same way that I cannot prevent organizations from capturing my every move on CCTV in shops, petrol forecourts, and even walking down certain streets. I am tracked and
monitored almost constantly and nobody bats an eyelid.  Unchecked, this new child tracking technology is a worry. Although it should be used to benefit us as a society, it is a
concern that the information could fall into the wrong hands. Government and other organizations are not always on the ball when it comes to protecting the data in their charge.

There have been some high profile cases of data loss involving sensitive data about citizens.  Control of this would be something crucial if I am to place my trust in whoever uses this technology.

One idea that springs to mind is that I want schools to require permission slips, signed by parents, that would grant permission to use the technology on an occasional basis only, and not a permanent one.  The tracking locator device itself should not be individually and personally assigned to my child, except on a temporary basis for a particular trip. Even then, preferably not identifiable to my child by anyone who accesses the tracking system (e.g. the tracker number could be assigned in a separate manual register).

As is often the case, technology is moving faster than we are prepared for.  We need to sit back and consider the consequences of widespread adoption of GPS Surveillance for good or bad.  If we do, I’m hopeful that we can all benefit.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Posted in GPS Surveillance | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Child GPS Tracking by parents for kids in school

I recently read an interesting discussion on an internet forum about child gps tracking.  A parent asked for recommendations for a tracking locator device to use while her child was in daycare.  She reasoned “I worry about my kids, and just knowing that they are where they’re supposed to be would put my mind at rest.  Am I over reacting or is child tracking something I should look into?

An ex-teacher replied, somewhat irked

…when you choose a provider, whether it be a daycare or a home center, you are placing faith in that provider to protect your child at all times. Don’t you think a GPS on a child would

  1. make that child feel singled out? and
  2. make the provider feel that she can’t do her job?

The parent must wholeheartedly trust another human to take care of the parents most treasured possession.

A day care provider also made the comment

As a provider however, I would doubt the parent. I’d worry about whether the parent would cause issues down the road.

There is validity in these responses, and I can understand the feelings of people who have in mind only the best interests of the children in their care.  It comes as no surprise to me that there is a general feeling that the parent is being over-protective and that this potentially could have a negative effect on the development of their child (i.e. the child may feel that the parent doesn’t trust them).  When I read the discussion, I was pretty much on the side of the care providers and thought that GPS surveillance of children at school or daycare was a bit over-the-top.  Probably the last place I was considering having a need to track my children would be while they are at school and in the care of professional teachers, who are trained to look after those in their care.  Why would it be necessary?

Well, I have to say that a couple of very recent news reports have me re-evaluating my stance.  The reports were quite shocking for me, because I never really expected that such incidents would be allowed to happen.  In the first incident, a five year old boy ran from school during a recess and made his way home, crossing a busy main road en-route.  Thankfully he arrived home safely to his shocked mother.  Apparently, it took some time for the school to realise he was missing before they began a search, but more disturbingly – they didn’t even call the police!  It is only since a subsequent meeting between the boy’s mother and school chiefs that procedures have been modified to ensure that police are called as soon as it is discovered that a child has gone missing.  It seems incredible that this simple procedure was not in place in the first place!  I wonder how many other schoolds have even thought about what they will do in these circumstances.

The second incident also occured last week and bore a striking resemblance to the one above, in that a five year old girl wandered from school during a recess.  The school did a headcount and realised that she was missing and quickly called the police.  She was subsequently found by the police wandering near busy roads having already traversed a rail track.  At least this school had acted quickly on realization that a child was missing.  However both of these cases make me wonder what the schools do in order to ensure the safety of our children.  It may be a recess for the children, but that doesn’t mean that the teachers can simply stop looking after them.  In the second case there were six teachers looking after the children! So how is it that not one of them spotted the wandering child? How was it that these children were allowed to leave the school premises unchallenged?  Both were only five years old – it’s not like they were experienced truants!

It had already crossed my mind to include a child tracking device on my child whenever they were going on an outward-bound school trip, in case the unthinkable should happen in an unfamiliar territory.  Now, these incidents have got me thinking that actually I should track the children at all times!!!

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Posted in Child GPS | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Tracking Locator Features – Initial Observations

As previously mentioned, I am currently in the early stages of looking at child tracking technology and how it can help me keep track of my two young children, currently aged 4 and 2.

There seem to be a large number of alternative tracking locator devices that are on offer, such as GPS enabled mobile phones with tracking software installed, or some dedicated trackers which can send geolocation results via SMS to the parent’s mobile phone, or direct to a remote monitoring service. There are also some older technologies for tracking mobile phones based on their proximity to a nearby mobile phone masts (cells) using triangulation, but for my purposes I don’t consider these to be anywhere near as accurate as I would like. In my own tests, I have found that my location can be displayed up to a mile away from my true location – which is utter nonsense! On a fairly short walk, I saw my location jump by half a mile, a yet still be nowhere near my true location. I could imagine being sent into a minor panic if I was tracking my children using this method! GPS tracking by satellite is far superior, as I have witnessed with the accuracy of data returned from my GPS-enabled running watch.

The tracking devices for tracking a child needs to be small – though I’m not at all keen on the idea of having a grain sized device implanted under the skin of my children, as that is way too permanent for my liking! However, I want something small enough to be less easily detected in the event of an abduction attempt – however unlikely that particular scenario may be – and certainly small enough to be carried with the child at all times. If it has to be carried in a backpack, it is likely that the child will be separated from the backpack at certain times. There are some trackers made for children that are designed as wrist-watch style devices, and this is possibly the better solution. Otherwise, I want a device that will fit unobtrusively in a pocket.

The features of tracking devices vary and some features are more important than others when it comes to tracking my children.

Battery life is very important as it would be useless to have a device that doesn’t transmit whenever required. Unlike car tracking, there is nowhere on a child to plug in the device to keep it charged! So the intrinsic life of the battery must be good on a single charge. In addition, the GPS coverage would need to be very good and the accuracy should be as near as possible to the true location of the device. Some older and cheaper devices are not as accurate as the more modern ones.

Although it is possibly cheaper to simply have location information sent to the parents mobile phone, this has some drawbacks. Often you then need to manually enter the location coordinates into, say, google maps or something similar in order to see the whereabouts of the child. Only the person with the receiving phone would be able to check the current position and it would require some effort on their part. I believe that this means that the unit will quickly fall into dis-use as it soon becomes a chore. Using a remote web service to store the details has a number of potential advantages including mapping functions, historical tracking, and the ability to allow a number of authorized people access to track the child from any web-enabled devices. This is also an advantage over some models that require local PC software to be installed in order to view the information. The centralized tracking also ensures that the last movement of the child were always known and could be checked at any point in time.

Some alerting is desirable if my child should wander outside of an area that I expect him to be in. A panic alarm is a good idea for when the child is a bit older, but I’m not yet convinced that it will help very young children (it will make for an interesting test!).

Overall cost is a naturally big factor, including running costs. It costs money to purchase the tracking locator device, then more to send sms messages to the device (if used to trigger a location request), then more for sms messages to be sent from the device. Alternatively, there is a charge for a company to store the tracking details, provide maps and reports and so on.  There are ways to mitigate some of these costs, which I will discuss in future articles.

So there are a lot of things to consider and a number of alternative solutions. I’ll post more later about specific features as my investigations progress. I haven’t yet made my mind up what I want, though I am leaning towards having a tracking locator device that is monitored externally. That way, I think it is more likely to be used long-term than if I have to get the locations and input them manually into some other software. Purchasing a device would be a waste of money if it became too much of a hassle to actually use it in practice!

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Posted in Tracking Locator | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Child Tracking – Motivation

Welcome to childtracking.org.  I thought I would start out with a brief introduction to myself and my motivation for investigating potential child tracking methods.  I’m a parent with two young children, currently aged 4 and 2.  They are typical toddlers that I love to bits and I will do whatever is necessary to keep them from harm.  What parent wouldn’t, after all?

It was while on an extended holiday to China that I was faced with one of my fears that kept me awake at night.  Quite simply it was the fear of – what would happen if one of the children went missing?  You have to be a parent to appreciate that no amount of statistics telling you that the chance of abduction is small can alleviate this fear.  The most minute chance is still a chance,  and it isn’t only abduction that is a concern.  There are other scenarios that, while mundane on the surface, can drive a parent frantic with worry.  The following is a case in point.

Within three days of having arrived in China there was a (thankfully, minor) incident that was the trigger for my sleepless nights.  We had arranged a small Birthday party for my son – who had just turned four years old – which was held at a hotel restaurant nearby to where we were staying.  The guests were mainly relatives who lived locally, including my niece and nephew aged 5 and 7 respectively.  On this occasion I wasn’t feeling too well and had a headache, so I went for a solo walk outside to get some fresh air and hopefully alleviate the pain.

As I walked up the street, I was looking around and taking in the sights of the city when I spotted my son and nephew up ahead!  They were looking for me and had run straight past me in the crowd!  Of course, I immediately called out and my nephew heard me, grabbed my son’s arm and pulled him back towards me.  I told him never to run off like that again, then took them both back to the hotel restaurant.  It was apparent that everyone was oblivious to the fact that the two children had gone outside at all.

This got me seriously thinking – or should I say worrying!  What would have happened if I hadn’t seen the two boys running ahead?  Or if they had run in the complete opposite direction looking for me?  My nephew could speak Chinese and knew the area, but it could have been disastrous if he had become separated from my son – who was unable to speak a word of the language and was completely new to the area.  He could have gotten himself lost in an instant.

Although I played down the incident, I barely slept at all that night, and had disturbed sleep for some time to come.  I imagined my son being inconsolable and unable to tell the police who he was or where he was living.  All that I could think about was – how would I handle the situation if either of my children went missing?  The outlook was always grim, unless I could pro-actively take steps that would help resolve the situation, quickly and efficiently.  I began to research ideas.  I have found some potential solutions, but am still researching. I have decided to share my findings with you so that we can discuss best practices for keeping our children safe by being informed.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Posted in Child Tracking | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment